Demographics details for Jackson, MI vs Georgetown, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Jackson, MI vs Georgetown, IN.
Data | Jackson | Georgetown |
---|---|---|
Population | 31,031 | 4,497 |
Median Age | 35.0 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $41,988 | $65,000 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 65.0% |
Poverty Level | 21% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.9 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Jackson vs Georgetown
- In Jackson, the population is higher at 31,031, compared to 4,497 in Georgetown.
- The median age in Georgetown is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Georgetown has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
- In Georgetown, the percentage of married families is higher at 65.0%, compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 5% in Georgetown.
- The unemployment rate in Jackson is higher at 7.9%, compared to 3.0% in Georgetown.
Demographics
Demographics Jackson vs Georgetown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Jackson | Georgetown |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 5 |
White | 62 | 90 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Jackson vs Georgetown
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Jackson at 21% compared to 5% in Georgetown.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Georgetown at 90% compared to 62% in Jackson.
- In Georgetown, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Jackson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Jackson at 6% compared to 2% in Georgetown.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Jackson at 10% compared to 1% in Georgetown.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Jackson and Georgetown at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Jackson | Georgetown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 27.0% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 26.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 41.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Jackson vs Georgetown
- More residents in Jackson report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- Depression is more prevalent in Jackson at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Jackson at 26.4% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Jackson at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- Obesity rates are higher in Jackson at 41.0% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- Disability percentages are higher in Jackson at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Jackson | Georgetown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (166) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 21.1% (6,548) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (4,397) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (3,126) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Jackson vs Georgetown
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- More residents in Jackson have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Jackson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 0.0% in Georgetown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.