Demographics details for Iuka, MS vs Stanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Iuka, MS vs Stanton, CA.
| Data | Iuka | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,096 | 38,952 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $43,887 | $76,123 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Iuka vs Stanton
- The population in Stanton is higher at 38,952, compared to 3,096 in Iuka.
- The median age in Stanton is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 37.2 years in Iuka.
- Stanton has a higher median income of $76,123, compared to $43,887 in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Stanton.
- Iuka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 0% in Stanton.
- The unemployment rate in Iuka is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.3% in Stanton.
Demographics
Demographics Iuka vs Stanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Iuka | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 94 | 8 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 26 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 52 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Iuka vs Stanton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Iuka at 4% compared to 2% in Stanton.
- Iuka has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 8% in Stanton.
- In Stanton, the Asian population stands at 26%, greater than 0% in Iuka.
- Stanton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 0% in Iuka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stanton at 11%, compared to 2% in Iuka.
- In Stanton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Iuka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Iuka | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 13.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Iuka vs Stanton
- More residents in Iuka report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.9% in Stanton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Iuka at 26.4% compared to 17.0% in Stanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Iuka at 25.7% compared to 13.0% in Stanton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Iuka at 14.6% compared to 14.3% in Stanton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 28.4% in Stanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Iuka at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Stanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Iuka | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (75) | 3.9% (1,532) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (616) | 15.2% (5,904) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (650) | 31.4% (12,250) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (348) | 14.1% (5,475) |
Education Levels Comparison: Iuka vs Stanton
- In Stanton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 2.4% in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 15.2% in Stanton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanton at 31.4%, compared to 21.0% in Iuka.
- In Stanton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 11.2% in Iuka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.