Demographics details for Iuka, MS vs Pocahontas, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Iuka, MS vs Pocahontas, AR.
| Data | Iuka | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,096 | 7,546 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,887 | $38,912 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Iuka vs Pocahontas
- The population in Pocahontas is higher at 7,546, compared to 3,096 in Iuka.
- Residents in Iuka have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- Iuka has a higher median income of $43,887 compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Pocahontas.
- Iuka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 19% in Pocahontas.
- The unemployment rate in Iuka is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Pocahontas.
Demographics
Demographics Iuka vs Pocahontas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Iuka | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 94 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Iuka vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Iuka at 4% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- Iuka has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 90% in Pocahontas.
- In Pocahontas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Iuka.
- Pocahontas has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Iuka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pocahontas at 7%, compared to 2% in Iuka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Iuka and Pocahontas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Iuka | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 22.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 27.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Iuka vs Pocahontas
- In Pocahontas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 19.6% in Iuka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pocahontas at 29.9% versus 26.4% in Iuka.
- Pocahontas has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 25.7% in Iuka.
- Binge drinking is more common in Iuka at 14.6% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 40.0% in Iuka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Iuka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Iuka | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (75) | 0.5% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (616) | 19.8% (1,491) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (650) | 15.7% (1,186) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (348) | 10.4% (782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Iuka vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.5% in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 19.8% in Pocahontas.
- More residents in Iuka have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 15.7% in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.