Demographics details for Iuka, MS vs Griffin, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Iuka, MS vs Griffin, IN.
| Data | Iuka | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,096 | 142 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $43,887 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Iuka vs Griffin
- In Iuka, the population is higher at 3,096, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- Residents in Iuka have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250, compared to $43,887 in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Griffin.
- Iuka has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in Griffin.
- The unemployment rate in Iuka is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Griffin.
Demographics
Demographics Iuka vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Iuka | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 94 | 98 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Iuka vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Iuka at 4% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 98% compared to 94% in Iuka.
- Both Iuka and Griffin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Iuka and Griffin at 0%.
- Both Iuka and Griffin have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Iuka and Griffin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Iuka | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Iuka vs Griffin
- More residents in Iuka report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.2% in Griffin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Iuka at 26.4% compared to 26.3% in Griffin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Iuka at 25.7% compared to 18.5% in Griffin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Griffin at 17.4% compared to 14.6% in Iuka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Iuka at 40.0% compared to 37.8% in Griffin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Iuka at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Iuka | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (75) | 1.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 19.9% (616) | 16.9% (24) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (650) | 9.9% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (348) | 12.0% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Iuka vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.4% in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Iuka hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 16.9% in Griffin.
- More residents in Iuka have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 9.9% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 11.2% in Iuka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.