Demographics details for Ithaca, MI vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ithaca, MI vs Fairmont, NC.
| Data | Ithaca | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,808 | 2,188 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,389 | $31,731 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Ithaca vs Fairmont
- In Ithaca, the population is higher at 2,808, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 42.2 years in Ithaca.
- Ithaca has a higher median income of $60,389 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ithaca at 39.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 13% in Ithaca.
- Fairmont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Ithaca.
Demographics
Demographics Ithaca vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ithaca | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 62 |
| White | 87 | 14 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Ithaca vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 1% in Ithaca.
- Ithaca has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- Both Ithaca and Fairmont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ithaca at 8% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ithaca at 3% compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 1% in Ithaca.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ithaca | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 27.0% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 21.2% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 47.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ithaca vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.5% in Ithaca.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ithaca at 27.0% compared to 22.6% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 21.2% in Ithaca.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ithaca at 18.0% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 36.4% in Ithaca.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in Ithaca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ithaca | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (43) | 0.3% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 21.4% (602) | 27.5% (602) |
| Less than High School | 13.1% (368) | 12.9% (282) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.6% (495) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ithaca vs Fairmont
- A higher percentage of residents in Ithaca have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 21.4% in Ithaca.
- More residents in Ithaca have less than a high school education at 13.1% compared to 12.9% in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ithaca hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.6% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.