Demographics details for Island park, NY vs Irvine, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Island park, NY vs Irvine, CA.
Data | Island park | Irvine |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,969 | 313,685 |
Median Age | 42.7 years | 33.8 years |
Median Income | $96,875 | $122,948 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Island park vs Irvine
- The population in Irvine is higher at 313,685, compared to 4,969 in Island park.
- Residents in Island park have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948, compared to $96,875 in Island park.
- In Irvine, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Island park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Island park and Irvine at 6%.
- The unemployment rate in Island park is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Irvine.
Demographics
Demographics Island park vs Irvine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Island park | Irvine |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 56 | 34 |
Asian | 4 | 43 |
Hispanic | 33 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Island park vs Irvine
- In Irvine, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Island park.
- Island park has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 34% in Irvine.
- In Irvine, the Asian population stands at 43%, greater than 4% in Island park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Island park at 33% compared to 11% in Irvine.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irvine at 10%, compared to 6% in Island park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Island park and Irvine at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Island park | Irvine |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 7.7% |
Depression | 17.4% | 15.4% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 7.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 21.0% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Island park vs Irvine
- More residents in Island park report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Depression is more prevalent in Island park at 17.4% compared to 15.4% in Irvine.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Island park at 14.1% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Island park at 17.9% compared to 14.9% in Irvine.
- Obesity rates are higher in Island park at 29.5% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- Disability percentages are higher in Island park at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Island park | Irvine |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (27) | 0.8% (2,579) |
High School Diploma | 27.9% (1,388) | 3.8% (12,010) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (443) | 3.4% (10,664) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (819) | 44.3% (138,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Island park vs Irvine
- In Irvine, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Island park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Island park hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- More residents in Island park have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- In Irvine, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 16.5% in Island park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.