Demographics details for Island park, NY vs Crosbyton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Island park, NY vs Crosbyton, TX.
Data | Island park | Crosbyton |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,969 | 1,461 |
Median Age | 42.7 years | 39.1 years |
Median Income | $96,875 | $47,083 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 22% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Island park vs Crosbyton
- In Island park, the population is higher at 4,969, compared to 1,461 in Crosbyton.
- Residents in Island park have a higher median age of 42.7 years compared to 39.1 years in Crosbyton.
- Island park has a higher median income of $96,875 compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Island park.
- The poverty level is higher in Crosbyton at 22%, compared to 6% in Island park.
- The unemployment rate in Island park is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Island park vs Crosbyton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Island park | Crosbyton |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 3 |
White | 56 | 6 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 33 | 75 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Island park vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Island park.
- Island park has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- The Asian population is larger in Island park at 4% compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 33% in Island park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Crosbyton at 16%, compared to 6% in Island park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Island park and Crosbyton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Island park | Crosbyton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 15.6% |
Depression | 17.4% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 14.1% | 20.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.4% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 42.7% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Island park vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.6% in Island park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crosbyton at 23.6% versus 17.4% in Island park.
- Crosbyton has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 14.1% in Island park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Island park at 17.9% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 29.5% in Island park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 8.0% in Island park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Island park | Crosbyton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (27) | 2.1% (30) |
High School Diploma | 27.9% (1,388) | 24.6% (359) |
Less than High School | 8.9% (443) | 37.1% (542) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (819) | 8.8% (129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Island park vs Crosbyton
- In Crosbyton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Island park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Island park hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 24.6% in Crosbyton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crosbyton at 37.1%, compared to 8.9% in Island park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Island park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.