Demographics details for Isabella, OK vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Isabella, OK vs Powder springs, GA.

Data Isabella Powder springs
Population 86 17,337
Median Age 28.6 years 38.7 years
Median Income $56,550 $88,311
Married Families 42.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Isabella vs Powder springs

  • The population in Powder springs is higher at 17,337, compared to 86 in Isabella.
  • The median age in Powder springs is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 28.6 years in Isabella.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311, compared to $56,550 in Isabella.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Isabella at 42.0% compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Powder springs at 12%, compared to 10% in Isabella.
  • Powder springs has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Isabella.

Demographics

Demographics Isabella vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Isabella Powder springs
Black Data is updating 51
White 86 22
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 19
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian 14 1

Demographics Comparison: Isabella vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 0% in Isabella.
  • Isabella has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Isabella.
  • Powder springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 0% in Isabella.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Powder springs at 5%, compared to 0% in Isabella.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Isabella at 14% compared to 1% in Powder springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Isabella Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 17.1% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 10.7%
Depression 23.6% 17.7%
Smoking 19.0% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 14.4%
Obesity 42.6% 33.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Isabella vs Powder springs

  • More residents in Isabella report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Isabella at 23.6% compared to 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Isabella at 19.0% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Isabella at 16.1% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Isabella at 42.6% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Powder springs at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Isabella.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Isabella Powder springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 44.2% (38) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.3% (14) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: Isabella vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Isabella.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Isabella hold a high school diploma at 44.2% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Powder springs at 7.6%, compared to 0.0% in Isabella.
  • In Powder springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 16.3% in Isabella.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.