Demographics details for Irvington, AL vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irvington, AL vs Provo, UT.
Data | Irvington | Provo |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,335 | 113,523 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 23.6 years |
Median Income | $43,000 | $57,943 |
Married Families | 54.3% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Irvington vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 1,335 in Irvington.
- Residents in Irvington have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943, compared to $43,000 in Irvington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irvington at 54.3% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- Irvington has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Irvington is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Irvington vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Irvington | Provo |
---|---|---|
Black | 76.4 | 1 |
White | 18.2 | 69 |
Asian | 0.3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2.5 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 2.6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Irvington vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Irvington at 76.4% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 18.2% in Irvington.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0.3% in Irvington.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2.5% in Irvington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 2.6% in Irvington.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Irvington | Provo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 24.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 8.4% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 7.3% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irvington vs Provo
- In Provo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 0.0% in Irvington.
- Provo has a higher smoking rate at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Provo at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- Provo has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Provo at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Irvington | Provo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (663) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.6% (5,209) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.7% (6,435) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irvington vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- In Provo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 4.6% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Provo at 5.7%, compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Irvington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.