Demographics details for Irving, TX vs Reading, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irving, TX vs Reading, PA.
Data | Irving | Reading |
---|---|---|
Population | 254,715 | 94,858 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 31.1 years |
Median Income | $76,686 | $42,852 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Irving vs Reading
- In Irving, the population is higher at 254,715, compared to 94,858 in Reading.
- Residents in Irving have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- Irving has a higher median income of $76,686 compared to $42,852 in Reading.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irving at 39.0% compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- The poverty level is higher in Reading at 25%, compared to 12% in Irving.
- Reading has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.9% in Irving.
Demographics
Demographics Irving vs Reading provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Irving | Reading |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 11 |
White | 11 | 60 |
Asian | 22 | 1 |
Hispanic | 43 | 67 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Irving vs Reading
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Irving at 13% compared to 11% in Reading.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Reading at 60% compared to 11% in Irving.
- The Asian population is larger in Irving at 22% compared to 1% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 43% in Irving.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Reading at 21%, compared to 11% in Irving.
- In Reading, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Irving.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Irving | Reading |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 18.1% |
Depression | 21.0% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 26.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 13.0% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 44.7% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irving vs Reading
- In Reading, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.9% in Irving.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Reading at 23.1% versus 21.0% in Irving.
- Reading has a higher smoking rate at 26.5% compared to 15.4% in Irving.
- Binge drinking is more common in Irving at 17.4% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Reading has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 32.4% in Irving.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Reading at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Irving | Reading |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (4,699) | 2.6% (2,442) |
High School Diploma | 10.3% (26,322) | 17.8% (16,896) |
Less than High School | 24.8% (63,108) | 32.2% (30,522) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (66,363) | 6.9% (6,512) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irving vs Reading
- In Reading, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.8% in Irving.
- In Reading, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 10.3% in Irving.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Reading at 32.2%, compared to 24.8% in Irving.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irving hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 6.9% in Reading.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.