Demographics details for Irving, TX vs Murfreesboro, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irving, TX vs Murfreesboro, TN.
| Data | Irving | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 254,715 | 162,398 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $76,686 | $70,451 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Irving vs Murfreesboro
- In Irving, the population is higher at 254,715, compared to 162,398 in Murfreesboro.
- Residents in Irving have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Irving has a higher median income of $76,686 compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irving at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- Irving has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Murfreesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Irving is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Irving vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Irving | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 13 | 17 |
| White | 11 | 66 |
| Asian | 22 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 43 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Irving vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 13% in Irving.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Murfreesboro at 66% compared to 11% in Irving.
- The Asian population is larger in Irving at 22% compared to 3% in Murfreesboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Irving at 43% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Irving at 11% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irving and Murfreesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Irving | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irving vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.9% in Irving.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Murfreesboro at 26.5% versus 21.0% in Irving.
- Murfreesboro has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 15.4% in Irving.
- Binge drinking is more common in Irving at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 32.4% in Irving.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Murfreesboro at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Irving | Murfreesboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (4,699) | 0.6% (920) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (26,322) | 10.7% (17,362) |
| Less than High School | 24.8% (63,108) | 6.2% (10,101) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (66,363) | 23.4% (38,019) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irving vs Murfreesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Irving have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
- In Murfreesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 10.3% in Irving.
- More residents in Irving have less than a high school education at 24.8% compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irving hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 23.4% in Murfreesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.