Demographics details for Irving, TX vs Litchfield park, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irving, TX vs Litchfield park, AZ.
Data | Irving | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Population | 254,715 | 6,960 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $76,686 | $117,601 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Irving vs Litchfield park
- In Irving, the population is higher at 254,715, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
- The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 32.4 years in Irving.
- Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $76,686 in Irving.
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 39.0% in Irving.
- Irving has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
- Litchfield park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Irving.
Demographics
Demographics Irving vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Irving | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 2 |
White | 11 | 57 |
Asian | 22 | 6 |
Hispanic | 43 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Irving vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Irving at 13% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield park at 57% compared to 11% in Irving.
- The Asian population is larger in Irving at 22% compared to 6% in Litchfield park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Irving at 43% compared to 23% in Litchfield park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 11% in Irving.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irving and Litchfield park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Irving | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.3% |
Depression | 21.0% | 18.9% |
Smoking | 15.4% | 10.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irving vs Litchfield park
- More residents in Irving report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Irving at 21.0% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Irving at 15.4% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 17.4% in Irving.
- Obesity rates are higher in Irving at 32.4% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Litchfield park at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Irving | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (4,699) | 0.2% (16) |
High School Diploma | 10.3% (26,322) | 11.2% (777) |
Less than High School | 24.8% (63,108) | 2.2% (150) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.1% (66,363) | 36.0% (2,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irving vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of residents in Irving have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.2% compared to 10.3% in Irving.
- More residents in Irving have less than a high school education at 24.8% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 26.1% in Irving.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.