Demographics details for Irving, IL vs Springdale, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irving, IL vs Springdale, AR.
| Data | Irving | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 370 | 87,672 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $59,985 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Irving vs Springdale
- The population in Springdale is higher at 87,672, compared to 370 in Irving.
- Residents in Irving have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 32.1 years in Springdale.
- Springdale has a higher median income of $59,985, compared to $50,000 in Irving.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irving at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Springdale.
- The poverty level is identical in both Irving and Springdale at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Irving is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.7% in Springdale.
Demographics
Demographics Irving vs Springdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Irving | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 91 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 38 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Irving vs Springdale
- In Springdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Irving.
- Irving has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 36% in Springdale.
- In Springdale, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Irving.
- Springdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 38%, compared to 4% in Irving.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springdale at 19%, compared to 4% in Irving.
- In Springdale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Irving.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Irving | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 35.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irving vs Springdale
- In Springdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.6% in Irving.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springdale at 25.2% versus 24.0% in Irving.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Irving at 22.1% compared to 20.4% in Springdale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Irving at 17.3% compared to 14.2% in Springdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Irving at 39.5% compared to 35.5% in Springdale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Irving at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Springdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Irving | Springdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.6% (2,317) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (92) | 14.5% (12,683) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (76) | 26.6% (23,284) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (34) | 14.0% (12,306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irving vs Springdale
- In Springdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Irving.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irving hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 14.5% in Springdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Springdale at 26.6%, compared to 20.5% in Irving.
- In Springdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 9.2% in Irving.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.