Demographics details for Irving, IL vs Beallsville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irving, IL vs Beallsville, OH.
| Data | Irving | Beallsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 370 | 348 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $33,125 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Irving vs Beallsville
- In Irving, the population is higher at 370, compared to 348 in Beallsville.
- Residents in Irving have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 34.6 years in Beallsville.
- Irving has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $33,125 in Beallsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irving at 44.0% compared to 33.0% in Beallsville.
- The poverty level is higher in Beallsville at 12%, compared to 10% in Irving.
- The unemployment rate in Irving is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Beallsville.
Demographics
Demographics Irving vs Beallsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Irving | Beallsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Irving vs Beallsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Irving at 1% compared to 0% in Beallsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beallsville at 96% compared to 91% in Irving.
- Both Irving and Beallsville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Irving at 4% compared to 0% in Beallsville.
- Both Irving and Beallsville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irving and Beallsville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Irving | Beallsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irving vs Beallsville
- In Beallsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.6% in Irving.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beallsville at 26.1% versus 24.0% in Irving.
- Beallsville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 22.1% in Irving.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beallsville at 19.1% compared to 17.3% in Irving.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 39.5%.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Irving and Beallsville at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Irving | Beallsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (92) | 39.4% (137) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (76) | 7.2% (25) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (34) | 2.6% (9) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irving vs Beallsville
- In Beallsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Irving.
- In Beallsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.4% compared to 24.9% in Irving.
- More residents in Irving have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 7.2% in Beallsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irving hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 2.6% in Beallsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.