Demographics details for Irvine, CA vs Union springs, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irvine, CA vs Union springs, AL.
| Data | Irvine | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 313,685 | 3,242 |
| Median Age | 33.8 years | 28.1 years |
| Median Income | $122,948 | $24,921 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Irvine vs Union springs
- In Irvine, the population is higher at 313,685, compared to 3,242 in Union springs.
- Residents in Irvine have a higher median age of 33.8 years compared to 28.1 years in Union springs.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948 compared to $24,921 in Union springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irvine at 39.0% compared to 17.0% in Union springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Union springs at 25%, compared to 6% in Irvine.
- Union springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Irvine.
Demographics
Demographics Irvine vs Union springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Irvine | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 69 |
| White | 34 | 4 |
| Asian | 43 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Irvine vs Union springs
- In Union springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 69% compared to 2% in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Irvine at 43% compared to 1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 11% in Irvine.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Irvine at 10% compared to 4% in Union springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irvine and Union springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Irvine | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 16.9% |
| Depression | 15.4% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 25.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 21.0% | 49.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irvine vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union springs at 20.8% versus 15.4% in Irvine.
- Union springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Irvine at 14.9% compared to 11.1% in Union springs.
- Union springs has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union springs at 15.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Irvine | Union springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,579) | 3.6% (117) |
| High School Diploma | 3.8% (12,010) | 15.1% (489) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (10,664) | 33.7% (1,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.3% (138,926) | 7.3% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irvine vs Union springs
- In Union springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.8% in Irvine.
- In Union springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union springs at 33.7%, compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irvine hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 7.3% in Union springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.