Demographics details for Irvine, CA vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irvine, CA vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Irvine | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 313,685 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 33.8 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $122,948 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Irvine vs Hopkins
- In Irvine, the population is higher at 313,685, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948 compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irvine at 39.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Irvine has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The unemployment rate in Irvine is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Hopkins.
Demographics
Demographics Irvine vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Irvine | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 83 |
| White | 34 | 16 |
| Asian | 43 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Irvine vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 2% in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Irvine at 43% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Irvine at 11% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Irvine at 10% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irvine and Hopkins at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Irvine | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 15.4% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 21.0% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irvine vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hopkins at 18.8% versus 15.4% in Irvine.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hopkins at 16.0% compared to 14.9% in Irvine.
- Hopkins has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Irvine | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,579) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 3.8% (12,010) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (10,664) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.3% (138,926) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irvine vs Hopkins
- A higher percentage of residents in Irvine have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Hopkins.
- In Hopkins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hopkins at 11.3%, compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irvine hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 16.2% in Hopkins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.