Demographics details for Irvine, CA vs Hobart, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irvine, CA vs Hobart, IN.
| Data | Irvine | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 313,685 | 29,458 |
| Median Age | 33.8 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $122,948 | $69,398 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Irvine vs Hobart
- In Irvine, the population is higher at 313,685, compared to 29,458 in Hobart.
- The median age in Hobart is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948 compared to $69,398 in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irvine at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Hobart.
- The poverty level is higher in Hobart at 8%, compared to 6% in Irvine.
- Hobart has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.2% in Irvine.
Demographics
Demographics Irvine vs Hobart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Irvine | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 11 |
| White | 34 | 63 |
| Asian | 43 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Irvine vs Hobart
- In Hobart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 2% in Irvine.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hobart at 63% compared to 34% in Irvine.
- The Asian population is larger in Irvine at 43% compared to 2% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 11% in Irvine.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Irvine at 10% compared to 7% in Hobart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irvine and Hobart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Irvine | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 15.4% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 7.5% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 21.0% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irvine vs Hobart
- In Hobart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hobart at 24.5% versus 15.4% in Irvine.
- Hobart has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobart at 18.9% compared to 14.9% in Irvine.
- Hobart has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hobart at 14.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Irvine | Hobart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (2,579) | 0.7% (217) |
| High School Diploma | 3.8% (12,010) | 24.5% (7,227) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (10,664) | 8.2% (2,428) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.3% (138,926) | 16.3% (4,813) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irvine vs Hobart
- A higher percentage of residents in Irvine have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Hobart.
- In Hobart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobart at 8.2%, compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irvine hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 16.3% in Hobart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.