Demographics details for Irvine, CA vs Hazelton, ID

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Irvine, CA vs Hazelton, ID.

Data Irvine Hazelton
Population 313,685 814
Median Age 33.8 years 36.3 years
Median Income $122,948 $44,468
Married Families 39.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 6% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Irvine vs Hazelton

  • In Irvine, the population is higher at 313,685, compared to 814 in Hazelton.
  • The median age in Hazelton is higher at 36.3 years, compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
  • Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948 compared to $44,468 in Hazelton.
  • In Hazelton, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 39.0% in Irvine.
  • The poverty level is higher in Hazelton at 15%, compared to 6% in Irvine.
  • The unemployment rate in Irvine is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Hazelton.

Demographics

Demographics Irvine vs Hazelton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Irvine Hazelton
Black 2 Data is updating
White 34 85
Asian 43 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 73
Two or More Races 10 29
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Irvine vs Hazelton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Irvine at 2% compared to 0% in Hazelton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Hazelton at 85% compared to 34% in Irvine.
  • The Asian population is larger in Irvine at 43% compared to 0% in Hazelton.
  • Hazelton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 11% in Irvine.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hazelton at 29%, compared to 10% in Irvine.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irvine and Hazelton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Irvine Hazelton
Mental Health Not Good 12.7% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 14.0%
Depression 15.4% 22.8%
Smoking 7.5% 19.3%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 14.9%
Obesity 21.0% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Irvine vs Hazelton

  • In Hazelton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hazelton at 22.8% versus 15.4% in Irvine.
  • Hazelton has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
  • Binge drinking rates are similar in both Irvine and Hazelton at 14.9%.
  • Hazelton has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazelton at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Irvine Hazelton
No Schooling 0.8% (2,579) 0.5% (4)
High School Diploma 3.8% (12,010) 18.2% (148)
Less than High School 3.4% (10,664) 72.0% (586)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 44.3% (138,926) 6.0% (49)

Education Levels Comparison: Irvine vs Hazelton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Irvine have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Hazelton.
  • In Hazelton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazelton at 72.0%, compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Irvine hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 6.0% in Hazelton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.