Demographics details for Irvine, CA vs Closter, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irvine, CA vs Closter, NJ.
Data | Irvine | Closter |
---|---|---|
Population | 313,685 | 8,514 |
Median Age | 33.8 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $122,948 | $181,652 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 2% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Irvine vs Closter
- In Irvine, the population is higher at 313,685, compared to 8,514 in Closter.
- The median age in Closter is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Closter has a higher median income of $181,652, compared to $122,948 in Irvine.
- In Closter, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 39.0% in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 2% in Closter.
- Closter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in Irvine.
Demographics
Demographics Irvine vs Closter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Irvine | Closter |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 34 | 44 |
Asian | 43 | 35 |
Hispanic | 11 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Irvine vs Closter
- In Closter, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Irvine.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Closter at 44% compared to 34% in Irvine.
- The Asian population is larger in Irvine at 43% compared to 35% in Closter.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Irvine at 11% compared to 8% in Closter.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Irvine at 10% compared to 8% in Closter.
- In Closter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Irvine.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Irvine | Closter |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 11.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 6.9% |
Depression | 15.4% | 14.9% |
Smoking | 7.5% | 9.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 21.0% | 21.2% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irvine vs Closter
- More residents in Irvine report poor mental health at 12.7% compared to 11.7% in Closter.
- Depression is more prevalent in Irvine at 15.4% compared to 14.9% in Closter.
- Closter has a higher smoking rate at 9.4% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Closter at 16.0% compared to 14.9% in Irvine.
- Closter has higher obesity rates at 21.2% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Closter at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Irvine | Closter |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (2,579) | 0.6% (49) |
High School Diploma | 3.8% (12,010) | 8.7% (744) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (10,664) | 5.4% (457) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.3% (138,926) | 44.4% (3,779) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irvine vs Closter
- A higher percentage of residents in Irvine have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in Closter.
- In Closter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.7% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Closter at 5.4%, compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- In Closter, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.4% compared to 44.3% in Irvine.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.