Demographics details for Irvine, CA vs Birmingham, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Irvine, CA vs Birmingham, AL.
Data | Irvine | Birmingham |
---|---|---|
Population | 313,685 | 196,910 |
Median Age | 33.8 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $122,948 | $42,464 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Irvine vs Birmingham
- In Irvine, the population is higher at 313,685, compared to 196,910 in Birmingham.
- The median age in Birmingham is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948 compared to $42,464 in Birmingham.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Irvine at 39.0% compared to 23.0% in Birmingham.
- The poverty level is higher in Birmingham at 19%, compared to 6% in Irvine.
- The unemployment rate in Irvine is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Birmingham.
Demographics
Demographics Irvine vs Birmingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Irvine | Birmingham |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 70 |
White | 34 | 21 |
Asian | 43 | 2 |
Hispanic | 11 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Irvine vs Birmingham
- In Birmingham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 2% in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to 21% in Birmingham.
- The Asian population is larger in Irvine at 43% compared to 2% in Birmingham.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Irvine at 11% compared to 4% in Birmingham.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Irvine at 10% compared to 3% in Birmingham.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Irvine and Birmingham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Irvine | Birmingham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.7% | 14.6% |
Depression | 15.4% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 7.5% | 21.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 12.7% |
Obesity | 21.0% | 45.7% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Irvine vs Birmingham
- In Birmingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Birmingham at 21.2% versus 15.4% in Irvine.
- Birmingham has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Irvine at 14.9% compared to 12.7% in Birmingham.
- Birmingham has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Birmingham at 19.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Irvine | Birmingham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (2,579) | 0.9% (1,793) |
High School Diploma | 3.8% (12,010) | 17.5% (34,520) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (10,664) | 10.1% (19,856) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 44.3% (138,926) | 20.6% (40,596) |
Education Levels Comparison: Irvine vs Birmingham
- In Birmingham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Irvine.
- In Birmingham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Birmingham at 10.1%, compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- A higher percentage of residents in Irvine hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 20.6% in Birmingham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.