Demographics details for Interlachen, FL vs College place, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Interlachen, FL vs College place, WA.

Data Interlachen College place
Population 1,457 9,804
Median Age 48.6 years 32.2 years
Median Income $50,776 $60,417
Married Families 39.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Interlachen vs College place

  • The population in College place is higher at 9,804, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
  • Residents in Interlachen have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 32.2 years in College place.
  • College place has a higher median income of $60,417, compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Interlachen at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in College place.
  • Interlachen has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in College place.
  • College place has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Interlachen.

Demographics

Demographics Interlachen vs College place provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Interlachen College place
Black 11 Data is updating
White 37 72
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 34 18
Two or More Races 18 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Interlachen vs College place

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Interlachen at 11% compared to 0% in College place.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in College place at 72% compared to 37% in Interlachen.
  • In College place, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Interlachen.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Interlachen at 34% compared to 18% in College place.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Interlachen at 18% compared to 8% in College place.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Interlachen and College place at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Interlachen College place
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.9% 10.9%
Depression 20.3% 26.6%
Smoking 24.5% 12.8%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 17.6%
Obesity 35.5% 32.7%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Interlachen vs College place

  • More residents in Interlachen report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in College place.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in College place at 26.6% versus 20.3% in Interlachen.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Interlachen at 24.5% compared to 12.8% in College place.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in College place at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Interlachen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Interlachen at 35.5% compared to 32.7% in College place.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in College place.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Interlachen College place
No Schooling 2.0% (29) 0.1% (14)
High School Diploma 22.0% (320) 8.6% (847)
Less than High School 41.7% (607) 13.2% (1,295)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (151) 22.7% (2,224)

Education Levels Comparison: Interlachen vs College place

  • A higher percentage of residents in Interlachen have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.1% in College place.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Interlachen hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 8.6% in College place.
  • More residents in Interlachen have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 13.2% in College place.
  • In College place, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.