Demographics details for Interlachen, FL vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Interlachen, FL vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Interlachen | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,457 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 48.6 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,776 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Interlachen vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
- Residents in Interlachen have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Interlachen at 39.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 12% in Interlachen.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.5% in Interlachen.
Demographics
Demographics Interlachen vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Interlachen | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 4 |
| White | 37 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Interlachen vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Interlachen at 11% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Interlachen has a higher percentage of White residents at 37% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Interlachen.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 34% in Interlachen.
- Both Interlachen and Coalinga have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 18%.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Interlachen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Interlachen | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Interlachen vs Coalinga
- More residents in Interlachen report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Interlachen at 20.3% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Interlachen at 24.5% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Interlachen at 16.7% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 35.5% in Interlachen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Interlachen | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (29) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (320) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 41.7% (607) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (151) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Interlachen vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 2.0% in Interlachen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Interlachen hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- More residents in Interlachen have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 39.2% in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Interlachen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.