Demographics details for Interlachen, FL vs Chesapeake, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Interlachen, FL vs Chesapeake, VA.
| Data | Interlachen | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,457 | 252,488 |
| Median Age | 48.6 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,776 | $92,703 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Interlachen vs Chesapeake
- The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 1,457 in Interlachen.
- Residents in Interlachen have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703, compared to $50,776 in Interlachen.
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 39.0% in Interlachen.
- Interlachen has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- The unemployment rate in Interlachen is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Interlachen vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Interlachen | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 29 |
| White | 37 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Interlachen vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 11% in Interlachen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chesapeake at 53% compared to 37% in Interlachen.
- In Chesapeake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Interlachen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Interlachen at 34% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Interlachen at 18% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Interlachen and Chesapeake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Interlachen | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Interlachen vs Chesapeake
- More residents in Interlachen report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chesapeake at 20.9% versus 20.3% in Interlachen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Interlachen at 24.5% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Interlachen at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
- Chesapeake has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 35.5% in Interlachen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Interlachen at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Interlachen | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (29) | 0.8% (2,039) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (320) | 13.1% (33,024) |
| Less than High School | 41.7% (607) | 7.0% (17,684) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (151) | 23.8% (60,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Interlachen vs Chesapeake
- A higher percentage of residents in Interlachen have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.8% in Chesapeake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Interlachen hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- More residents in Interlachen have less than a high school education at 41.7% compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 10.4% in Interlachen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.