Demographics details for Indianola, IA vs Griffin, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Indianola, IA vs Griffin, IN.
| Data | Indianola | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,069 | 142 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $73,534 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Indianola vs Griffin
- In Indianola, the population is higher at 16,069, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- Residents in Indianola have a higher median age of 34.7 years compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Indianola has a higher median income of $73,534 compared to $61,250 in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Indianola.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 8%, compared to 7% in Indianola.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Indianola.
Demographics
Demographics Indianola vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Indianola | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 98 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Indianola vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Indianola at 1% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 98% compared to 91% in Indianola.
- The Asian population is larger in Indianola at 2% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Indianola at 2% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Indianola at 4% compared to 2% in Griffin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Indianola and Griffin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Indianola | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.2% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Indianola vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.7% in Indianola.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Griffin at 26.3% versus 19.0% in Indianola.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 16.5% in Indianola.
- Binge drinking is more common in Indianola at 21.4% compared to 17.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Indianola at 39.2% compared to 37.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Griffin at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Indianola.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Indianola | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (43) | 1.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (2,326) | 16.9% (24) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (566) | 9.9% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (3,217) | 12.0% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Indianola vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Indianola.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Indianola.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 9.9%, compared to 3.5% in Indianola.
- A higher percentage of residents in Indianola hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.