Demographics details for Indianapolis, IN vs Mason, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Indianapolis, IN vs Mason, OH.
| Data | Indianapolis | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 880,621 | 35,520 |
| Median Age | 34.3 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,110 | $121,082 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Indianapolis vs Mason
- In Indianapolis, the population is higher at 880,621, compared to 35,520 in Mason.
- The median age in Mason is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 34.3 years in Indianapolis.
- Mason has a higher median income of $121,082, compared to $59,110 in Indianapolis.
- In Mason, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 31.0% in Indianapolis.
- Indianapolis has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Mason.
- Mason has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.4% in Indianapolis.
Demographics
Demographics Indianapolis vs Mason provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Indianapolis | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 5 |
| White | 50 | 74 |
| Asian | 4 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Indianapolis vs Mason
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Indianapolis at 29% compared to 5% in Mason.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mason at 74% compared to 50% in Indianapolis.
- In Mason, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 4% in Indianapolis.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Indianapolis at 11% compared to 3% in Mason.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Indianapolis at 6% compared to 4% in Mason.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Indianapolis and Mason at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Indianapolis | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Indianapolis vs Mason
- More residents in Indianapolis report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.5% in Mason.
- Depression is more prevalent in Indianapolis at 25.3% compared to 19.8% in Mason.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Indianapolis at 20.7% compared to 11.8% in Mason.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mason at 19.1% compared to 16.7% in Indianapolis.
- Obesity rates are higher in Indianapolis at 37.4% compared to 33.5% in Mason.
- Disability percentages are higher in Indianapolis at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Mason.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Indianapolis | Mason |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (13,330) | 0.5% (183) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (130,921) | 8.9% (3,151) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (120,182) | 3.0% (1,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (193,312) | 40.7% (14,469) |
Education Levels Comparison: Indianapolis vs Mason
- A higher percentage of residents in Indianapolis have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Mason.
- A higher percentage of residents in Indianapolis hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 8.9% in Mason.
- More residents in Indianapolis have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 3.0% in Mason.
- In Mason, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.7% compared to 22.0% in Indianapolis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.