Demographics details for Indianapolis, IN vs Gibsonburg, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Indianapolis, IN vs Gibsonburg, OH.

Data Indianapolis Gibsonburg
Population 880,621 2,436
Median Age 34.3 years 38.7 years
Median Income $59,110 $67,279
Married Families 31.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 4.3

Population Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg

  • In Indianapolis, the population is higher at 880,621, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
  • The median age in Gibsonburg is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 34.3 years in Indianapolis.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279, compared to $59,110 in Indianapolis.
  • In Gibsonburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Indianapolis.
  • Indianapolis has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Indianapolis is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.3% in Gibsonburg.

Demographics

Demographics Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Indianapolis Gibsonburg
Black 29 2
White 50 79
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 10
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Indianapolis at 29% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gibsonburg at 79% compared to 50% in Indianapolis.
  • The Asian population is larger in Indianapolis at 4% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Indianapolis at 11% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gibsonburg at 9%, compared to 6% in Indianapolis.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Indianapolis and Gibsonburg at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Indianapolis Gibsonburg
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 12.3%
Depression 25.3% 23.0%
Smoking 20.7% 21.9%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 18.4%
Obesity 37.4% 42.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg

  • In Gibsonburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Indianapolis.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Indianapolis at 25.3% compared to 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
  • Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 20.7% in Indianapolis.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Indianapolis.
  • Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 37.4% in Indianapolis.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Indianapolis at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Indianapolis Gibsonburg
No Schooling 1.5% (13,330) 0.2% (4)
High School Diploma 14.9% (130,921) 35.6% (867)
Less than High School 13.6% (120,182) 5.1% (125)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (193,312) 11.3% (275)

Education Levels Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg

  • A higher percentage of residents in Indianapolis have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
  • In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 14.9% in Indianapolis.
  • More residents in Indianapolis have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Indianapolis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.