Demographics details for Indianapolis, IN vs Gibsonburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Indianapolis, IN vs Gibsonburg, OH.
Data | Indianapolis | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 880,621 | 2,436 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 38.7 years |
Median Income | $59,110 | $67,279 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg
- In Indianapolis, the population is higher at 880,621, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- The median age in Gibsonburg is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 34.3 years in Indianapolis.
- Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279, compared to $59,110 in Indianapolis.
- In Gibsonburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Indianapolis.
- Indianapolis has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- The unemployment rate in Indianapolis is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.3% in Gibsonburg.
Demographics
Demographics Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Indianapolis | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 29 | 2 |
White | 50 | 79 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 11 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Indianapolis at 29% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gibsonburg at 79% compared to 50% in Indianapolis.
- The Asian population is larger in Indianapolis at 4% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Indianapolis at 11% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gibsonburg at 9%, compared to 6% in Indianapolis.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Indianapolis and Gibsonburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Indianapolis | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 12.3% |
Depression | 25.3% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 20.7% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Indianapolis.
- Depression is more prevalent in Indianapolis at 25.3% compared to 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 20.7% in Indianapolis.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 16.7% in Indianapolis.
- Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 37.4% in Indianapolis.
- Disability percentages are higher in Indianapolis at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Indianapolis | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (13,330) | 0.2% (4) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (130,921) | 35.6% (867) |
Less than High School | 13.6% (120,182) | 5.1% (125) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (193,312) | 11.3% (275) |
Education Levels Comparison: Indianapolis vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Indianapolis have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 14.9% in Indianapolis.
- More residents in Indianapolis have less than a high school education at 13.6% compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Indianapolis hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.