Demographics details for Indiana, PA vs Pittsburg, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Indiana, PA vs Pittsburg, KS.
| Data | Indiana | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,205 | 20,658 |
| Median Age | 21.8 years | 25.7 years |
| Median Income | $40,013 | $42,371 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Indiana vs Pittsburg
- The population in Pittsburg is higher at 20,658, compared to 14,205 in Indiana.
- The median age in Pittsburg is higher at 25.7 years, compared to 21.8 years in Indiana.
- Pittsburg has a higher median income of $42,371, compared to $40,013 in Indiana.
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 21.0% in Indiana.
- The poverty level is higher in Pittsburg at 23%, compared to 17% in Indiana.
- The unemployment rate in Indiana is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Indiana vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Indiana | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 3 |
| White | 86 | 78 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Indiana vs Pittsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Indiana at 5% compared to 3% in Pittsburg.
- Indiana has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 78% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Indiana.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 3% in Indiana.
- Both Indiana and Pittsburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Indiana and Pittsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Indiana | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 41.2% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Indiana vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.4% in Indiana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pittsburg at 25.0% versus 24.5% in Indiana.
- Pittsburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 20.1% in Indiana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pittsburg at 19.7% compared to 17.1% in Indiana.
- Pittsburg has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 41.2% in Indiana.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pittsburg at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Indiana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Indiana | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (3) | 0.7% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (1,089) | 13.0% (2,686) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (454) | 5.9% (1,222) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (2,801) | 17.2% (3,562) |
Education Levels Comparison: Indiana vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Indiana.
- In Pittsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.0% compared to 7.7% in Indiana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pittsburg at 5.9%, compared to 3.2% in Indiana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Indiana hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 17.2% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.