Demographics details for Indian trail, NC vs Rutherford, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Indian trail, NC vs Rutherford, NJ.
Data | Indian trail | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
Population | 41,724 | 18,662 |
Median Age | 36.1 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $95,101 | $128,576 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Indian trail vs Rutherford
- In Indian trail, the population is higher at 41,724, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- The median age in Rutherford is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 36.1 years in Indian trail.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576, compared to $95,101 in Indian trail.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Indian trail at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Rutherford.
- The poverty level is higher in Rutherford at 9%, compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The unemployment rate in Indian trail is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Indian trail vs Rutherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Indian trail | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 3 |
White | 71 | 49 |
Asian | 3 | 16 |
Hispanic | 11 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Indian trail vs Rutherford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Indian trail at 9% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- Indian trail has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 3% in Indian trail.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 11% in Indian trail.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rutherford at 11%, compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Indian trail and Rutherford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Indian trail | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 7.8% |
Depression | 22.0% | 17.0% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 10.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 31.2% | 24.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Indian trail vs Rutherford
- More residents in Indian trail report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Indian trail at 22.0% compared to 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Indian trail at 13.5% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Indian trail at 31.2% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rutherford at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Indian trail | Rutherford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (287) | 0.9% (161) |
High School Diploma | 12.8% (5,353) | 12.4% (2,318) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (2,761) | 6.3% (1,175) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (10,201) | 38.9% (7,259) |
Education Levels Comparison: Indian trail vs Rutherford
- In Rutherford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Indian trail.
- A higher percentage of residents in Indian trail hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- More residents in Indian trail have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 24.4% in Indian trail.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.