Demographics details for Indian trail, NC vs Fishers, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Indian trail, NC vs Fishers, IN.
| Data | Indian trail | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,724 | 101,966 |
| Median Age | 36.1 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,101 | $126,548 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Indian trail vs Fishers
- The population in Fishers is higher at 101,966, compared to 41,724 in Indian trail.
- The median age in Fishers is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 36.1 years in Indian trail.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548, compared to $95,101 in Indian trail.
- In Fishers, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 45.0% in Indian trail.
- Indian trail has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Fishers.
- The unemployment rate in Indian trail is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Fishers.
Demographics
Demographics Indian trail vs Fishers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Indian trail | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 5 |
| White | 71 | 80 |
| Asian | 3 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Indian trail vs Fishers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Indian trail at 9% compared to 5% in Fishers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishers at 80% compared to 71% in Indian trail.
- In Fishers, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Indian trail.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Indian trail at 11% compared to 3% in Fishers.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Indian trail at 6% compared to 4% in Fishers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Indian trail and Fishers at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Indian trail | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 31.2% | 27.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Indian trail vs Fishers
- More residents in Indian trail report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fishers at 22.2% versus 22.0% in Indian trail.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Indian trail at 13.5% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Indian trail at 31.2% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Indian trail and Fishers at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Indian trail | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (287) | 0.4% (418) |
| High School Diploma | 12.8% (5,353) | 6.5% (6,652) |
| Less than High School | 6.6% (2,761) | 2.0% (2,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (10,201) | 41.2% (42,051) |
Education Levels Comparison: Indian trail vs Fishers
- A higher percentage of residents in Indian trail have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Fishers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Indian trail hold a high school diploma at 12.8% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- More residents in Indian trail have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 2.0% in Fishers.
- In Fishers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 24.4% in Indian trail.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.