Demographics details for Hyrum, UT vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hyrum, UT vs Cochran, GA.
Data | Hyrum | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,594 | 4,647 |
Median Age | 29.2 years | 28.9 years |
Median Income | $75,951 | $31,326 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Hyrum vs Cochran
- In Hyrum, the population is higher at 10,594, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Hyrum have a higher median age of 29.2 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Hyrum has a higher median income of $75,951 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hyrum at 43.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 10% in Hyrum.
- Cochran has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.4% in Hyrum.
Demographics
Demographics Hyrum vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hyrum | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 53 |
White | 80 | 40 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 13 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hyrum vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 0% in Hyrum.
- Hyrum has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hyrum.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hyrum at 13% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hyrum at 6% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hyrum and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hyrum | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.7% |
Depression | 24.0% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 9.7% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 11.2% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 32.2% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hyrum vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in Hyrum.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hyrum at 24.0% compared to 21.8% in Cochran.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 9.7% in Hyrum.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochran at 13.6% compared to 11.2% in Hyrum.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 32.2% in Hyrum.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Hyrum.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hyrum | Cochran |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (264) | 1.2% (54) |
High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,117) | 12.2% (569) |
Less than High School | 8.5% (899) | 15.1% (703) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.2% (1,721) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hyrum vs Cochran
- A higher percentage of residents in Hyrum have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.2% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 10.5% in Hyrum.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 8.5% in Hyrum.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hyrum hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.