Demographics details for Hydro, OK vs Sulphur springs, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hydro, OK vs Sulphur springs, TX.
Data | Hydro | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 898 | 16,408 |
Median Age | 37.3 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $37,361 | $54,950 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hydro vs Sulphur springs
- The population in Sulphur springs is higher at 16,408, compared to 898 in Hydro.
- The median age in Sulphur springs is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 37.3 years in Hydro.
- Sulphur springs has a higher median income of $54,950, compared to $37,361 in Hydro.
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Hydro.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur springs at 15%, compared to 0% in Hydro.
- Sulphur springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.6% in Hydro.
Demographics
Demographics Hydro vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hydro | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 14 |
White | 76 | 63 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hydro vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 1% in Hydro.
- Hydro has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
- In Sulphur springs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Hydro.
- Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 8% in Hydro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hydro at 10% compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hydro at 5% compared to 0% in Sulphur springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hydro | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.2% |
Depression | 25.9% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 40.6% | 39.5% |
Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hydro vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.9% in Hydro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hydro at 25.9% compared to 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hydro at 20.2% compared to 20.1% in Sulphur springs.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 14.5% in Hydro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hydro at 40.6% compared to 39.5% in Sulphur springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hydro at 34.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hydro | Sulphur springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (127) |
High School Diploma | 27.6% (248) | 18.3% (3,003) |
Less than High School | 10.2% (92) | 16.0% (2,628) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (176) | 13.7% (2,248) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hydro vs Sulphur springs
- In Sulphur springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Hydro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hydro hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 18.3% in Sulphur springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur springs at 16.0%, compared to 10.2% in Hydro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hydro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.