Demographics details for Hydro, OK vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hydro, OK vs Cedar lake, IN.
| Data | Hydro | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 898 | 15,592 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $37,361 | $84,444 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hydro vs Cedar lake
- The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 898 in Hydro.
- The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 37.3 years in Hydro.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $37,361 in Hydro.
- In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Hydro.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedar lake at 5%, compared to 0% in Hydro.
- The unemployment rate in Hydro is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Hydro vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hydro | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 76 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hydro vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hydro at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 76% in Hydro.
- Both Hydro and Cedar lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hydro at 8% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hydro at 10% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hydro at 5% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hydro | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 34.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hydro vs Cedar lake
- More residents in Hydro report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.6% in Cedar lake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hydro at 25.9% compared to 25.4% in Cedar lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hydro at 20.2% compared to 18.8% in Cedar lake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 14.5% in Hydro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hydro at 40.6% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hydro at 34.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hydro | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (248) | 21.1% (3,292) |
| Less than High School | 10.2% (92) | 7.1% (1,102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (176) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hydro vs Cedar lake
- In Cedar lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Hydro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hydro hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 21.1% in Cedar lake.
- More residents in Hydro have less than a high school education at 10.2% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hydro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.