Demographics details for Hyattsville, MD vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hyattsville, MD vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Hyattsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,675 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $90,329 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Hyattsville vs Coalinga
- In Hyattsville, the population is higher at 20,675, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Hyattsville have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Hyattsville has a higher median income of $90,329 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hyattsville at 33.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 11% in Hyattsville.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.2% in Hyattsville.
Demographics
Demographics Hyattsville vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hyattsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 4 |
| White | 21 | 9 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hyattsville vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hyattsville at 28% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Hyattsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 21% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Hyattsville at 7% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 36% in Hyattsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 7% in Hyattsville.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Hyattsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hyattsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 13.8% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 38.0% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hyattsville vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.8% in Hyattsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coalinga at 16.4% versus 13.8% in Hyattsville.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 11.7% in Hyattsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 12.8% in Hyattsville.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 38.0% in Hyattsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Hyattsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hyattsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.3% (682) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (2,131) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 26.0% (5,380) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (6,840) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hyattsville vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of residents in Hyattsville have no formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 3.2% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 10.3% in Hyattsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 26.0% in Hyattsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hyattsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.