Demographics details for Hutchinson, KS vs Port clinton, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hutchinson, KS vs Port clinton, OH.

Data Hutchinson Port clinton
Population 39,699 5,966
Median Age 38.4 years 44.9 years
Median Income $55,265 $55,534
Married Families 36.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Hutchinson vs Port clinton

  • In Hutchinson, the population is higher at 39,699, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
  • The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 38.4 years in Hutchinson.
  • Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534, compared to $55,265 in Hutchinson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hutchinson at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Port clinton at 12%, compared to 10% in Hutchinson.
  • The unemployment rate in Hutchinson is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.

Demographics

Demographics Hutchinson vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hutchinson Port clinton
Black 3 3
White 74 82
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 13 7
Two or More Races 8 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hutchinson vs Port clinton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Hutchinson and Port clinton at 3%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Port clinton at 82% compared to 74% in Hutchinson.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hutchinson at 1% compared to 0% in Port clinton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hutchinson at 13% compared to 7% in Port clinton.
  • Both Hutchinson and Port clinton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hutchinson at 1% compared to 0% in Port clinton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hutchinson Port clinton
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 13.5%
Depression 25.0% 25.1%
Smoking 20.3% 24.0%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 17.9%
Obesity 42.4% 40.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hutchinson vs Port clinton

  • In Port clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.8% in Hutchinson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Port clinton at 25.1% versus 25.0% in Hutchinson.
  • Port clinton has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 20.3% in Hutchinson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Hutchinson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hutchinson at 42.4% compared to 40.7% in Port clinton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Hutchinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hutchinson Port clinton
No Schooling 0.2% (75) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.0% (6,363) 21.7% (1,296)
Less than High School 10.6% (4,195) 17.1% (1,023)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.0% (5,559) 13.8% (825)

Education Levels Comparison: Hutchinson vs Port clinton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hutchinson have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
  • In Port clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 16.0% in Hutchinson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port clinton at 17.1%, compared to 10.6% in Hutchinson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hutchinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.