Demographics details for Hutchinson, KS vs Lake leelanau, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hutchinson, KS vs Lake leelanau, MI.

Data Hutchinson Lake leelanau
Population 39,699 165
Median Age 38.4 years 27.9 years
Median Income $55,265 $48,125
Married Families 36.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.1

Population Comparison: Hutchinson vs Lake leelanau

  • In Hutchinson, the population is higher at 39,699, compared to 165 in Lake leelanau.
  • Residents in Hutchinson have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 27.9 years in Lake leelanau.
  • Hutchinson has a higher median income of $55,265 compared to $48,125 in Lake leelanau.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hutchinson at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Lake leelanau.
  • Hutchinson has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Lake leelanau.
  • Lake leelanau has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 4.0% in Hutchinson.

Demographics

Demographics Hutchinson vs Lake leelanau provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hutchinson Lake leelanau
Black 3 Data is updating
White 74 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 13 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hutchinson vs Lake leelanau

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hutchinson at 3% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lake leelanau at 100% compared to 74% in Hutchinson.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hutchinson at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hutchinson at 13% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hutchinson at 8% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hutchinson at 1% compared to 0% in Lake leelanau.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hutchinson Lake leelanau
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% 8.4%
Depression 25.0% 22.5%
Smoking 20.3% 12.5%
Binge Drinking 17.0% 18.9%
Obesity 42.4% 31.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hutchinson vs Lake leelanau

  • More residents in Hutchinson report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.4% in Lake leelanau.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Hutchinson at 25.0% compared to 22.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hutchinson at 20.3% compared to 12.5% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lake leelanau at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Hutchinson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hutchinson at 42.4% compared to 31.7% in Lake leelanau.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lake leelanau at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Hutchinson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hutchinson Lake leelanau
No Schooling 0.2% (75) 2.4% (4)
High School Diploma 16.0% (6,363) 13.3% (22)
Less than High School 10.6% (4,195) 4.8% (8)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.0% (5,559) 13.9% (23)

Education Levels Comparison: Hutchinson vs Lake leelanau

  • In Lake leelanau, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.2% in Hutchinson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hutchinson hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.3% in Lake leelanau.
  • More residents in Hutchinson have less than a high school education at 10.6% compared to 4.8% in Lake leelanau.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hutchinson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 13.9% in Lake leelanau.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.