Demographics details for Hurtsboro, AL vs Midland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hurtsboro, AL vs Midland, TX.
Data | Hurtsboro | Midland |
---|---|---|
Population | 345 | 134,444 |
Median Age | 32.5 years | 31.4 years |
Median Income | $40,982 | $90,448 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 22% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Hurtsboro vs Midland
- The population in Midland is higher at 134,444, compared to 345 in Hurtsboro.
- Residents in Hurtsboro have a higher median age of 32.5 years compared to 31.4 years in Midland.
- Midland has a higher median income of $90,448, compared to $40,982 in Hurtsboro.
- In Midland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Hurtsboro.
- Hurtsboro has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 12% in Midland.
- The unemployment rate in Hurtsboro is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.9% in Midland.
Demographics
Demographics Hurtsboro vs Midland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hurtsboro | Midland |
---|---|---|
Black | 108 | 8 |
White | -12 | 29 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 45 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hurtsboro vs Midland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hurtsboro at 108% compared to 8% in Midland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Midland at 29% compared to -12% in Hurtsboro.
- In Midland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Hurtsboro.
- Midland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 45%, compared to 0% in Hurtsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Midland at 15%, compared to 3% in Hurtsboro.
- In Midland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hurtsboro.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hurtsboro | Midland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 11.1% |
Depression | 22.8% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 24.2% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 12.2% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 47.9% | 35.3% |
Disability Percentage | 35.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hurtsboro vs Midland
- More residents in Hurtsboro report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.1% in Midland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hurtsboro at 22.8% compared to 21.4% in Midland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hurtsboro at 24.2% compared to 15.0% in Midland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Midland at 18.6% compared to 12.2% in Hurtsboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hurtsboro at 47.9% compared to 35.3% in Midland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hurtsboro at 35.0% compared to 9.0% in Midland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hurtsboro | Midland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (3,705) |
High School Diploma | 26.1% (90) | 10.2% (13,724) |
Less than High School | 14.5% (50) | 17.6% (23,705) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (32) | 19.5% (26,213) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hurtsboro vs Midland
- In Midland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Hurtsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hurtsboro hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 10.2% in Midland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Midland at 17.6%, compared to 14.5% in Hurtsboro.
- In Midland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 9.3% in Hurtsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.