Demographics details for Huntington park, CA vs Beaver dam, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Huntington park, CA vs Beaver dam, WI.

Data Huntington park Beaver dam
Population 52,633 16,582
Median Age 33.5 years 40.4 years
Median Income $54,073 $65,802
Married Families 30.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.7 3.1

Population Comparison: Huntington park vs Beaver dam

  • In Huntington park, the population is higher at 52,633, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
  • The median age in Beaver dam is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 33.5 years in Huntington park.
  • Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $54,073 in Huntington park.
  • In Beaver dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Huntington park.
  • Huntington park has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
  • The unemployment rate in Huntington park is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.

Demographics

Demographics Huntington park vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Huntington park Beaver dam
Black 1 3
White 22 81
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 101 8
Two or More Races 20 6
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Huntington park vs Beaver dam

  • In Beaver dam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Huntington park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 22% in Huntington park.
  • In Beaver dam, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Huntington park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Huntington park at 101% compared to 8% in Beaver dam.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Huntington park at 20% compared to 6% in Beaver dam.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Huntington park at 2% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Huntington park Beaver dam
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 17.1% 10.6%
Depression 17.1% 23.6%
Smoking 15.0% 17.6%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 23.5%
Obesity 36.2% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Huntington park vs Beaver dam

  • More residents in Huntington park report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 17.1% in Huntington park.
  • Beaver dam has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Huntington park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 13.7% in Huntington park.
  • Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 36.2% in Huntington park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Huntington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Huntington park Beaver dam
No Schooling 5.9% (3,103) 0.3% (47)
High School Diploma 15.7% (8,283) 23.8% (3,947)
Less than High School 60.1% (31,608) 10.3% (1,706)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.0% (2,648) 18.2% (3,023)

Education Levels Comparison: Huntington park vs Beaver dam

  • A higher percentage of residents in Huntington park have no formal schooling at 5.9% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 15.7% in Huntington park.
  • More residents in Huntington park have less than a high school education at 60.1% compared to 10.3% in Beaver dam.
  • In Beaver dam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 5.0% in Huntington park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.