Demographics details for Huntingdon, TN vs Port clinton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Huntingdon, TN vs Port clinton, OH.
| Data | Huntingdon | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,424 | 5,966 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,167 | $55,534 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Huntingdon vs Port clinton
- The population in Port clinton is higher at 5,966, compared to 4,424 in Huntingdon.
- The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 33.4 years in Huntingdon.
- Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534, compared to $46,167 in Huntingdon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Huntingdon at 43.0% compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- Huntingdon has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Port clinton.
- The unemployment rate in Huntingdon is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Huntingdon vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Huntingdon | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 3 |
| White | 79 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Huntingdon vs Port clinton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Huntingdon at 15% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port clinton at 82% compared to 79% in Huntingdon.
- Both Huntingdon and Port clinton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Port clinton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Huntingdon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port clinton at 8%, compared to 6% in Huntingdon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Huntingdon and Port clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Huntingdon | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Huntingdon vs Port clinton
- More residents in Huntingdon report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.2% in Port clinton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Huntingdon at 28.5% compared to 25.1% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 23.9% in Huntingdon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 15.1% in Huntingdon.
- Port clinton has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 37.8% in Huntingdon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Huntingdon at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Port clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Huntingdon | Port clinton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (44) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (794) | 21.7% (1,296) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (776) | 17.1% (1,023) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (731) | 13.8% (825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Huntingdon vs Port clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Huntingdon have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- In Port clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 17.9% in Huntingdon.
- More residents in Huntingdon have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Huntingdon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.