Demographics details for Huntingdon, TN vs Hydro, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Huntingdon, TN vs Hydro, OK.
| Data | Huntingdon | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,424 | 898 |
| Median Age | 33.4 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $46,167 | $37,361 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Huntingdon vs Hydro
- In Huntingdon, the population is higher at 4,424, compared to 898 in Hydro.
- The median age in Hydro is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 33.4 years in Huntingdon.
- Huntingdon has a higher median income of $46,167 compared to $37,361 in Hydro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Huntingdon at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Hydro.
- Huntingdon has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Hydro.
- The unemployment rate in Huntingdon is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Hydro.
Demographics
Demographics Huntingdon vs Hydro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Huntingdon | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 79 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Huntingdon vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Huntingdon at 15% compared to 1% in Hydro.
- Huntingdon has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 76% in Hydro.
- Both Huntingdon and Hydro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Hydro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Huntingdon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hydro at 10%, compared to 6% in Huntingdon.
- In Hydro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Huntingdon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Huntingdon | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Huntingdon vs Hydro
- More residents in Huntingdon report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.9% in Hydro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Huntingdon at 28.5% compared to 25.9% in Hydro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Huntingdon at 23.9% compared to 20.2% in Hydro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Huntingdon at 15.1% compared to 14.5% in Hydro.
- Hydro has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 37.8% in Huntingdon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hydro at 34.0% compared to 26.0% in Huntingdon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Huntingdon | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (44) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (794) | 27.6% (248) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (776) | 10.2% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (731) | 19.6% (176) |
Education Levels Comparison: Huntingdon vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of residents in Huntingdon have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 17.9% in Huntingdon.
- More residents in Huntingdon have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 10.2% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 16.5% in Huntingdon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.