Demographics details for Humphrey, NE vs Parksley, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Humphrey, NE vs Parksley, VA.
| Data | Humphrey | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 844 | 808 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $67,750 | $74,844 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Humphrey vs Parksley
- In Humphrey, the population is higher at 844, compared to 808 in Parksley.
- The median age in Parksley is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 35.9 years in Humphrey.
- Parksley has a higher median income of $74,844, compared to $67,750 in Humphrey.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Humphrey at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in Parksley.
- The poverty level is higher in Parksley at 9%, compared to 7% in Humphrey.
- Parksley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Humphrey.
Demographics
Demographics Humphrey vs Parksley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Humphrey | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 35 |
| White | 97 | 46 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Humphrey vs Parksley
- In Parksley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 0% in Humphrey.
- Humphrey has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 46% in Parksley.
- Both Humphrey and Parksley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Parksley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 1% in Humphrey.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parksley at 6%, compared to 2% in Humphrey.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Humphrey and Parksley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Humphrey | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.3% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 15.1% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.2% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Humphrey vs Parksley
- In Parksley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 13.3% in Humphrey.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Parksley at 23.3% versus 15.1% in Humphrey.
- Parksley has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 15.4% in Humphrey.
- Binge drinking is more common in Humphrey at 23.2% compared to 15.6% in Parksley.
- Parksley has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 34.4% in Humphrey.
- Disability percentages are higher in Humphrey at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Parksley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Humphrey | Parksley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (8) | 2.0% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 14.1% (119) | 19.1% (154) |
| Less than High School | 7.5% (63) | 22.3% (180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.6% (106) | 17.9% (145) |
Education Levels Comparison: Humphrey vs Parksley
- In Parksley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.9% in Humphrey.
- In Parksley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 14.1% in Humphrey.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parksley at 22.3%, compared to 7.5% in Humphrey.
- In Parksley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 12.6% in Humphrey.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.