Demographics details for Humble, TX vs Litchfield park, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Humble, TX vs Litchfield park, AZ.
Data | Humble | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,336 | 6,960 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 47.7 years |
Median Income | $58,581 | $117,601 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Humble vs Litchfield park
- In Humble, the population is higher at 16,336, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
- The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 33.5 years in Humble.
- Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $58,581 in Humble.
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 31.0% in Humble.
- Humble has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
- The unemployment rate in Humble is higher at 6.2%, compared to 5.1% in Litchfield park.
Demographics
Demographics Humble vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Humble | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Black | 26 | 2 |
White | 5 | 57 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 50 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 18 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Humble vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Humble at 26% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield park at 57% compared to 5% in Humble.
- In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Humble.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Humble at 50% compared to 23% in Litchfield park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Humble at 18% compared to 12% in Litchfield park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Humble and Litchfield park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Humble | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 8.3% |
Depression | 21.0% | 18.9% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 10.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 27.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Humble vs Litchfield park
- More residents in Humble report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Humble at 21.0% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Humble at 18.1% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 18.1% in Humble.
- Obesity rates are higher in Humble at 38.5% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Litchfield park at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Humble.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Humble | Litchfield park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (346) | 0.2% (16) |
High School Diploma | 20.3% (3,321) | 11.2% (777) |
Less than High School | 16.9% (2,756) | 2.2% (150) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (1,435) | 36.0% (2,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Humble vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of residents in Humble have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Humble hold a high school diploma at 20.3% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
- More residents in Humble have less than a high school education at 16.9% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 8.8% in Humble.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.