Demographics details for Hughesville, PA vs Friona, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hughesville, PA vs Friona, TX.
| Data | Hughesville | Friona |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,133 | 4,053 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $65,897 | $67,837 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Hughesville vs Friona
- The population in Friona is higher at 4,053, compared to 2,133 in Hughesville.
- Residents in Hughesville have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 37.7 years in Friona.
- Friona has a higher median income of $67,837, compared to $65,897 in Hughesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hughesville at 52.0% compared to 51.0% in Friona.
- The poverty level is higher in Friona at 15%, compared to 7% in Hughesville.
- The unemployment rate in Hughesville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.0% in Friona.
Demographics
Demographics Hughesville vs Friona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hughesville | Friona |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 4 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 74 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hughesville vs Friona
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Hughesville and Friona at 1%.
- Hughesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 4% in Friona.
- The Asian population is larger in Hughesville at 1% compared to 0% in Friona.
- Friona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 74%, compared to 4% in Hughesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Friona at 19%, compared to 5% in Hughesville.
- In Friona, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Hughesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hughesville | Friona |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hughesville vs Friona
- In Friona, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Hughesville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hughesville at 23.9% compared to 21.4% in Friona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hughesville at 17.8% compared to 17.3% in Friona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hughesville at 18.5% compared to 16.5% in Friona.
- Friona has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 35.0% in Hughesville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hughesville at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Friona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hughesville | Friona |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (26) | 5.7% (232) |
| High School Diploma | 28.1% (600) | 13.4% (543) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (344) | 43.8% (1,777) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (465) | 8.4% (342) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hughesville vs Friona
- In Friona, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.7% compared to 1.2% in Hughesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hughesville hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 13.4% in Friona.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friona at 43.8%, compared to 16.1% in Hughesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hughesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 8.4% in Friona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.