Demographics details for Huddleston, VA vs Worcester, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Huddleston, VA vs Worcester, MA.

Data Huddleston Worcester
Population 157 205,319
Median Age 43.0 years 34.3 years
Median Income $50,000 $63,011
Married Families 60.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Huddleston vs Worcester

  • The population in Worcester is higher at 205,319, compared to 157 in Huddleston.
  • Residents in Huddleston have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 34.3 years in Worcester.
  • Worcester has a higher median income of $63,011, compared to $50,000 in Huddleston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Huddleston at 60.0% compared to 29.0% in Worcester.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Huddleston and Worcester at 12%.
  • Worcester has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Huddleston.

Demographics

Demographics Huddleston vs Worcester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Huddleston Worcester
Black 2 13
White 95 44
Asian 1 7
Hispanic 1 24
Two or More Races 1 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Huddleston vs Worcester

  • In Worcester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Huddleston.
  • Huddleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 44% in Worcester.
  • In Worcester, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Huddleston.
  • Worcester has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 1% in Huddleston.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Worcester at 12%, compared to 1% in Huddleston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Huddleston and Worcester at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Huddleston Worcester
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.8%
Depression Data is updating% 23.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.5%
Obesity Data is updating% 34.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Huddleston vs Worcester

  • In Worcester, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Worcester at 23.1% versus 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • Worcester has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Worcester at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • Worcester has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Worcester at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Huddleston Worcester
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.7% (3,577)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.6% (31,987)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.0% (32,925)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.5% (44,155)

Education Levels Comparison: Huddleston vs Worcester

  • In Worcester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • In Worcester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Worcester at 16.0%, compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.
  • In Worcester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Huddleston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.