Demographics details for Hoyt, KS vs Union city, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoyt, KS vs Union city, TN.
| Data | Hoyt | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 589 | 10,985 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $73,750 | $42,620 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hoyt vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 10,985, compared to 589 in Hoyt.
- Residents in Hoyt have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Union city.
- Hoyt has a higher median income of $73,750 compared to $42,620 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoyt at 56.0% compared to 35.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 7% in Hoyt.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Hoyt.
Demographics
Demographics Hoyt vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoyt | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 23 |
| White | 86 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hoyt vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 0% in Hoyt.
- Hoyt has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 61% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Hoyt at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Hoyt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 8%, compared to 4% in Hoyt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hoyt at 4% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoyt | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 22.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 29.8% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 27.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoyt vs Union city
- In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 15.8% in Hoyt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union city at 29.8% versus 22.2% in Hoyt.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 17.7% in Hoyt.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoyt at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Union city.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 39.5% in Hoyt.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Hoyt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoyt | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (3) | 0.5% (60) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (154) | 21.0% (2,309) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (74) | 18.4% (2,016) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (100) | 12.8% (1,408) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoyt vs Union city
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Hoyt and Union city at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 21.0% in Union city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union city at 18.4%, compared to 12.6% in Hoyt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.