Demographics details for Hoyt, KS vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hoyt, KS vs Taylorsville, UT.
| Data | Hoyt | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 589 | 57,879 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $73,750 | $81,417 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Hoyt vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 589 in Hoyt.
- Residents in Hoyt have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $73,750 in Hoyt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoyt at 56.0% compared to 40.0% in Taylorsville.
- The poverty level is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 7% in Hoyt.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Hoyt.
Demographics
Demographics Hoyt vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hoyt | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 86 | 57 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | 4 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hoyt vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Hoyt.
- Hoyt has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Hoyt.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Hoyt.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 4% in Hoyt.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hoyt at 4% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hoyt | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hoyt vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.8% in Hoyt.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 22.2% in Hoyt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hoyt at 17.7% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hoyt at 19.0% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hoyt at 39.5% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hoyt at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hoyt | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (3) | 1.2% (721) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (154) | 16.9% (9,799) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (74) | 15.2% (8,775) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.0% (100) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hoyt vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Hoyt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 12.6% in Hoyt.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.