Demographics details for Hoyt, KS vs Matheson, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hoyt, KS vs Matheson, CO.

Data Hoyt Matheson
Population 589 712
Median Age 40.0 years 34.0 years
Median Income $73,750 $65,000
Married Families 56.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.0

Population Comparison: Hoyt vs Matheson

  • The population in Matheson is higher at 712, compared to 589 in Hoyt.
  • Residents in Hoyt have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 34.0 years in Matheson.
  • Hoyt has a higher median income of $73,750 compared to $65,000 in Matheson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hoyt at 56.0% compared to 45.0% in Matheson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Matheson at 10%, compared to 7% in Hoyt.
  • Matheson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Hoyt.

Demographics

Demographics Hoyt vs Matheson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hoyt Matheson
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 86 90
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 10
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian 4 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hoyt vs Matheson

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Hoyt and Matheson at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Matheson at 90% compared to 86% in Hoyt.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hoyt at 1% compared to 0% in Matheson.
  • Matheson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Hoyt.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hoyt at 4% compared to 0% in Matheson.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hoyt at 4% compared to 0% in Matheson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hoyt Matheson
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% Data is updating%
Depression 22.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.7% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 39.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 14.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hoyt vs Matheson

  • More residents in Hoyt report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Hoyt at 22.2% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hoyt at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hoyt at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hoyt at 39.5% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hoyt at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hoyt Matheson
No Schooling 0.5% (3) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 26.1% (154) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 12.6% (74) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.0% (100) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Hoyt vs Matheson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • More residents in Hoyt have less than a high school education at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hoyt hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.