Demographics details for Howard, CO vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Howard, CO vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Howard | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 976 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 45.0 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $55,970 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 64.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Howard vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 976 in Howard.
- Residents in Howard have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $55,970 in Howard.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Howard at 64.0% compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- Howard has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Howard.
Demographics
Demographics Howard vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Howard | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 22 |
| White | 90 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Howard vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 3% in Howard.
- Howard has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Howard.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 5% in Howard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 2% in Howard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Howard and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Howard | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 27.3% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Howard vs Clayton
- More residents in Howard report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Howard at 24.2% compared to 23.1% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Howard at 17.5% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Howard at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 27.3% in Howard.
- Disability percentages are higher in Howard at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Howard | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 31.8% (310) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 1.4% (14) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (186) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Howard vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Howard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Howard hold a high school diploma at 31.8% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 5.4%, compared to 1.4% in Howard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Howard hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.