Demographics details for Houghton, MI vs Waverly, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Houghton, MI vs Waverly, TN.
Data | Houghton | Waverly |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,035 | 4,297 |
Median Age | 31.9 years | 46.7 years |
Median Income | $52,736 | $43,750 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly
- In Houghton, the population is higher at 37,035, compared to 4,297 in Waverly.
- The median age in Waverly is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 31.9 years in Houghton.
- Houghton has a higher median income of $52,736 compared to $43,750 in Waverly.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Waverly at 12%, compared to 10% in Houghton.
- The unemployment rate in Houghton is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.5% in Waverly.
Demographics
Demographics Houghton vs Waverly provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Houghton | Waverly |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 91 | 91 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly
- In Waverly, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Houghton.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 91%.
- The Asian population is larger in Houghton at 3% compared to 0% in Waverly.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waverly at 5%, compared to 3% in Houghton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Houghton | Waverly |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.9% |
Depression | 24.8% | 28.8% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 23.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 35.4% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly
- In Waverly, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Houghton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waverly at 28.8% versus 24.8% in Houghton.
- Waverly has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 18.6% in Houghton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Houghton at 18.9% compared to 15.6% in Waverly.
- Waverly has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 35.4% in Houghton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waverly at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Houghton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Houghton | Waverly |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (131) | 1.0% (41) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (5,837) | 18.4% (792) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (2,321) | 21.9% (943) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (7,756) | 16.5% (709) |
Education Levels Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly
- In Waverly, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Houghton.
- In Waverly, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 15.8% in Houghton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waverly at 21.9%, compared to 6.3% in Houghton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Houghton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 16.5% in Waverly.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.