Demographics details for Houghton, MI vs Waverly, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Houghton, MI vs Waverly, TN.

Data Houghton Waverly
Population 37,035 4,297
Median Age 31.9 years 46.7 years
Median Income $52,736 $43,750
Married Families 35.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly

  • In Houghton, the population is higher at 37,035, compared to 4,297 in Waverly.
  • The median age in Waverly is higher at 46.7 years, compared to 31.9 years in Houghton.
  • Houghton has a higher median income of $52,736 compared to $43,750 in Waverly.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 35.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Waverly at 12%, compared to 10% in Houghton.
  • The unemployment rate in Houghton is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.5% in Waverly.

Demographics

Demographics Houghton vs Waverly provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Houghton Waverly
Black 1 2
White 91 91
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly

  • In Waverly, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Houghton.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 91%.
  • The Asian population is larger in Houghton at 3% compared to 0% in Waverly.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 2%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waverly at 5%, compared to 3% in Houghton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Houghton and Waverly at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Houghton Waverly
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 13.9%
Depression 24.8% 28.8%
Smoking 18.6% 23.6%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 15.6%
Obesity 35.4% 37.8%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly

  • In Waverly, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Houghton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Waverly at 28.8% versus 24.8% in Houghton.
  • Waverly has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 18.6% in Houghton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Houghton at 18.9% compared to 15.6% in Waverly.
  • Waverly has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 35.4% in Houghton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waverly at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Houghton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Houghton Waverly
No Schooling 0.4% (131) 1.0% (41)
High School Diploma 15.8% (5,837) 18.4% (792)
Less than High School 6.3% (2,321) 21.9% (943)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.9% (7,756) 16.5% (709)

Education Levels Comparison: Houghton vs Waverly

  • In Waverly, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Houghton.
  • In Waverly, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 15.8% in Houghton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waverly at 21.9%, compared to 6.3% in Houghton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Houghton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 16.5% in Waverly.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.