Demographics details for Houghton, MI vs Sudlersville, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Houghton, MI vs Sudlersville, MD.

Data Houghton Sudlersville
Population 37,035 516
Median Age 31.9 years 44.4 years
Median Income $52,736 $40,000
Married Families 35.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Houghton vs Sudlersville

  • In Houghton, the population is higher at 37,035, compared to 516 in Sudlersville.
  • The median age in Sudlersville is higher at 44.4 years, compared to 31.9 years in Houghton.
  • Houghton has a higher median income of $52,736 compared to $40,000 in Sudlersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Houghton at 35.0% compared to 21.0% in Sudlersville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sudlersville at 12%, compared to 10% in Houghton.
  • The unemployment rate in Houghton is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Sudlersville.

Demographics

Demographics Houghton vs Sudlersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Houghton Sudlersville
Black 1 5
White 91 86
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 2 9
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Houghton vs Sudlersville

  • In Sudlersville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Houghton.
  • Houghton has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 86% in Sudlersville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Houghton at 3% compared to 0% in Sudlersville.
  • Sudlersville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Houghton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Houghton at 3% compared to 0% in Sudlersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Houghton and Sudlersville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Houghton Sudlersville
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 11.3% 12.1%
Depression 24.8% 22.4%
Smoking 18.6% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 16.2%
Obesity 35.4% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Houghton vs Sudlersville

  • In Sudlersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.2% in Houghton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Houghton at 24.8% compared to 22.4% in Sudlersville.
  • Sudlersville has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 18.6% in Houghton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Houghton at 18.9% compared to 16.2% in Sudlersville.
  • Sudlersville has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 35.4% in Houghton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sudlersville at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Houghton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Houghton Sudlersville
No Schooling 0.4% (131) 0.6% (3)
High School Diploma 15.8% (5,837) 29.7% (153)
Less than High School 6.3% (2,321) 8.9% (46)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.9% (7,756) 9.1% (47)

Education Levels Comparison: Houghton vs Sudlersville

  • In Sudlersville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Houghton.
  • In Sudlersville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.7% compared to 15.8% in Houghton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sudlersville at 8.9%, compared to 6.3% in Houghton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Houghton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 9.1% in Sudlersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.