Demographics details for Houghton, MI vs South river, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Houghton, MI vs South river, NJ.
| Data | Houghton | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,035 | 15,990 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $52,736 | $95,981 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Houghton vs South river
- In Houghton, the population is higher at 37,035, compared to 15,990 in South river.
- The median age in South river is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 31.9 years in Houghton.
- South river has a higher median income of $95,981, compared to $52,736 in Houghton.
- In South river, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Houghton.
- Houghton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in South river.
- The unemployment rate in Houghton is higher at 5.5%, compared to 4.2% in South river.
Demographics
Demographics Houghton vs South river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Houghton | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 91 | 50 |
| Asian | 3 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Houghton vs South river
- In South river, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Houghton.
- Houghton has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 50% in South river.
- In South river, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Houghton.
- South river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in Houghton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South river at 7%, compared to 3% in Houghton.
- In South river, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Houghton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Houghton | South river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Houghton vs South river
- More residents in Houghton report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Houghton at 24.8% compared to 21.0% in South river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Houghton at 18.6% compared to 14.6% in South river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Houghton at 18.9% compared to 16.0% in South river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Houghton at 35.4% compared to 31.6% in South river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Houghton at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in South river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Houghton | South river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (131) | 2.5% (394) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (5,837) | 18.7% (2,985) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (2,321) | 20.6% (3,292) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (7,756) | 18.9% (3,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Houghton vs South river
- In South river, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.4% in Houghton.
- In South river, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Houghton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South river at 20.6%, compared to 6.3% in Houghton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Houghton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 18.9% in South river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.